
Chicago – After starting the season 0-2, both against the division, the Bears rattled off wins in 9 of their next 10 games. They then traded 1st place in the NFC North with Green Bay for consecutive weeks, and had an outside chance to get the 1-seed, but Seattle took care of business against San Francisco in Week 17 locking up the Bye in the Wild Card round for the NFC side.
The Bears finished the season with the 6th overall offense and 9th in scoring. Chicago was buoyed by their amazing turnover differential (more on that later), leading the NFL in takeaways as well as giving it away, thus leading the league in turnover differential. The turnovers are whey Chicago won the division, let alone had a winning record. Their defense is bottom-5 in essentially every category, other than taking the ball away – which most can be argued is the opposition “giving” them the ball. The Bears defense should be a chief concern of theirs and will be the reason their season comes to an end, whether it’s this weekend or next. They’re 29th in total defense and 23rd in scoring – meaning their offense must be on point, or their D needs to generate at least 2 turnovers, just to be “IN” the game.
Chicago may be the most reliant team in playoff history on turnovers…they’re 2-6 in games where they don’t get at least 2 turnovers. Peter Bukowski pointed this out, even though I covered this heading into the first matchup back on Dec. 7th. The Bears’ two wins in games they didn’t get 2 turnovers were against the Giants, where starting QB, Jaxon Dart, exited with a concussion on the play where he fumbled, the Giants’ lone turnover. The other win? Yep, against Green Bay when Jordan Love exited the game. Not to bring up painful memories, but while Green Bay only had 1 turnover (Jacobs’ fumble inside the 5-yard line), the muffed onside kick acts as a turnover, so essentially 2, bringing their record to 1-6. The lone win had Dart not been concussed, they lose that game too, kind of like the Packer game with Love…lotta fortunate bounces for this Bears team, all season.
Chicago is so reliant on turnovers that since the 2014 season, teams that win the turnover differential in the NFL have an avg. defensive ranking of 9th in scoring. Chicago is the 3rd team since 2014 to lead the NFL in turnover differential and have a scoring defense rank 23rd or worse. The other teams? 2020 Tennessee and 2023 New York Giants. The Titans in 2020 lost in the Wild Card round whereas the Giants didn’t even make the playoffs in 2023. Goes to show you that while turnovers equalize a game, over the course of a season, if your defense isn’t good, turnovers help, but then again when facing the best competition, you lose.
Green Bay – the Packers have been just the opposite of the Bears in the sense of “whatever can go wrong, eventually does.” The Packers started off as well as any team in the NFL, going 2-0 after beating two of the highest thought of teams in the NFC entering into the campaign; Detroit & Washington. Once the special teams and injuries inevitably reared their ugly heads, the season flipped on its head. That culminated, at least we thought, in Denver with 12:55 left in the 3rd quarter when Love took a kill shot, already leading 23-14, and it was intercepted by Patrick Surtain. On the play both Christian Watson and Zach Tom were injured. That killed the offense as there was no one to stretch the defense and the best pass-rush in the NFL would finally make headway. A drive or two later, Green Bay lost Micah Parsons for the season on a torn ACL – the season seemed like it ended right there. Just when we thought that was as bad as it was going to get, the special teams woke up and make 1 final appearance by snatching defeat from victory at Solider Field a week later. Not many teams enter the playoffs on a 4-game losing streak, mainly because teams that lose 4 in a row are flat out not good and don’t make the playoffs. However, this sets up yet another amazing opportunity for Green Bay to accomplish something special…again, beating Chicago is great and all, but should they lose to Seattle the following week, the season will be a disappointment.
Matchup Matrix

For the 3rd time in 35 days the Packers will play the Bears in the 2nd-most meaningful game between these two franchises in their history. On paper this looks like an even matchup, at least when Chicago has the ball. They’re 6th in total offense and 9th in scoring where as the Packers’ defense ranks 12th and 11th, respectfully. Keep in mind Green Bay’s defense has been faltering since Micah Parsons went on IR. For some context, here’s the disparity between having Micah vs. without:

On a per game basis, opponents are averaging an addition 6 plays, 106 yards, and the big one…9.3 more points per game against the Packers than when Micah Parsons was healthy, that is substantial. Had Green Bay finished the season giving up an average of 19.3 points per game, that would have tied them for 6th in the NFL with Kansas City. The pace they’re on, giving up 28.6 points/game now would put them at 28th in the league, in between Tennessee and Arizona, in terms of scoring defense…whoof.
The good news, is that the Packers didn’t have Micah Parsons in their last matchup against these Bears, and the defense was balling! Until it wasn’t. For 58:01, the Packers defense gave up 48 plays for 283 total yards (132 rushing, 151 passing) and just 9 points. That’s a dominant performance against a top-10 offense, on the road, in prime time. There’s a reason why Defensive Coordinator, Jeff Hafley, said, “We’re not done, I’ll see you next week.” It was his gameplan that stifled Ben Johnson, Caleb Williams, and the Bears offense for 97% of that game. There’s no reason to think the Packers can’t replicate that performance again. The big help for the defense came from the Packers’ offense. They controlled the time of possession, the ended the game with a 38:57 to 26:13 advantage, but before the onside kick, their advantage was 34:43 to 23:47 – meaning the Packers defense was playing almost a full quarter less of football than the Bears’. Now with a healthy Josh Jacobs and offensive line, there’s reason to believe Green Bay can mimic a similar output, but bear in mind (pun intended), many of those runs that elongated drives came on the legs of Malik Willis. On the flip side, Green Bay struggled in the red zone, going 0-for-5, that won’t happen again if Love is quarterbacking the entire game. Which has been the Packers’ bugaboo during this losing streak.
Is There A Mismatch?
When Love and the Packers have the ball, they’ll get to face the 29th defense in the NFL…in the previous 2 matchups, Green Bay’s offense had a total of 16 “real” possessions and only punted 3 times. The issue, that we mentioned, is the Red Zone efficiency. The Packers have combined to score 1 touchdown in their 6 red zone trips across these two games. This is the one statistic that’s worth keeping an eye on for the entirety of this game.
As for moving the ball, the Packers have had no issue going up and down the field against this defense. Assuming Green Bay gets the ball 8 times, they should have 4-6 red zone trips, the goal will be to convert 3 of those trips to touchdowns. If it’s 6 trips, better make it four. The reason why you should believe Love won’t have an issue moving the ball is that in the two games against the Bears, LaFleur’s offense has amassed 721 total yards, an average of 361/game, which is 50 yards over their season average. The mismatch in this game is Green Bay’s offense vs. Chicago’s defense.
Major Concern?
The chief concern, other than turnovers and Red Zone Offense (yeah, that’s a lot), if hoping that Ben Johnson’s ego gets in the way. If Chicago commits to the run, the Packers’ defense may be in some trouble. As we’ve seen all season, the Packer defense eventually wears down and struggles to stop the ground game, ranking 15th in the NFL against it. The best antidote to counteract it? Possess the ball – like mentioned above – quick scores are great, but long, methodical TD drives are best.
- Don’t give the ball away
- Score TDs in the Red Zone (50+%)
- Control the Time of Possession
Prediction Time

Season: 10-7
Overall: 117-76




































